Teams are expected to meet regularly outside of class. For Porject One each team should meet with their supervisor during the week of February 25. For Project Two each team should meet with their supervisor during the week of April 8 and again during the week of April 23.
For each project, the team must submit a written report describing (among other things) the problem that was investigated, the model used and the justification for it, results from analysis and simulation of the model, and the conclusions drawn from the results. To get a better idea of what is expected, take a look at this sample report for this sample project. Teams will also give a brief oral report summarizing their methods and findings. Teams must submit an electronic copy (pdf) of the slides used in their oral presentation. Teams must submit both a paper copy and an electronic copy (pdf) of their written report. Each team member must participate in the team's oral presentation as well as in its written report. The maximum score for these components are given by the following table.
  | Preparation | Oral Presentation | Written Report | Total |
Project One | 10 points | 10 points | 30 points | 50 points |
Project Two | 15 points | 15 points | 45 points | 75 points |
For each oral presentation, every person not in the team is expected to submit a paragraph or two on a separate sheet of paper summarizing and critiquing the report -- what did you feel were the main points of the report, what was hard to understand, what did you find particularly effective, etc. The quality of your summaries will contribute up to 5 points to your class engagement score.
  | Topics for Project One | Version | Team | Data | Presentation Date |
Portfolios: | Efficient Market Hypothesis   | February 12   | Meghana Doddapaneni   Stephen Palo   |
A: VFINX, VBMFX, VGSLX   B: VIMSX, VSCSX, VGTSX   C: Apple, Exxon-Mobil, Bank of America   |
March 12   |
  | Leveraged Portfolios   | February 12   | Wendy He   Jiateng Wang   |
A: VFINX, VBMFX, VGSLX   B: VGHCX, VGENX, VGPMX   C: Microsoft, Amazon, JP Morgan   |
March 14   |
  | Dimensional Significance   | February 12   | Vlada Dementyeva   Elizabeth O'Callaghan   |
A: VFINX, VBMFX, VGSLX   B: VGTSX, VBLTX, VTIBX   C: Intel, Proctor and Gamble, Wells Fargo   |
March 12   |
  | Histories and Weights   | February 12   | Lily Northcut   Jake Taub   |
A: VFINX, VBMFX, VGSLX   B: VEIEX, VTIBX, VGHCX,   C: IBM, UPS, Citigroup   |
March 12   |
Discovery: | Chemical Compound Visualization   | February 14   | Arvand Homer   Robert Long   |
  dsgdb9nsd_067507.xyz   | March 14   |
  | Chemical Compund Visualization   | February 14   | Stephen Kozak   Lawrence Pina   |
  dsgdb9nsd_109400.xyz   | March 14   |
  | Topics for Project Two | Version | Team | Data | Presentation Date |
Portfolio Models: | Model Uncertainies   | March 31   | Vlada Dementyeva   Jake Taub   |
A: VFINX, VBMFX, VGSLX   B: VGTSX, VGHCX, VTIBX   C: Intel, Proctor and Gamble, Citigroup   |
TBD   |
  | Estimator Uncertainies   | March 31   |     |
A: VFINX, VBMFX, VGSLX   B: TBD   C: TBD   |
TBD   |
  | Economic Uncertainies   | March 31   | Lily Northcut,   Elizabeth O'Callaghan,   Jiateng Wang   |
A: VFINX, VBMFX, VGSLX   B: VBLTX, VEIEX, VIMSX   C: Microsoft, Wells Fargo, UPS   |
TBD   |
Structure Discovery: | Social/Sceintific Collaboration Network | May 1   | Meghana Doddapaneni   Arvand Homer   |
W1_CA-AstroPh.txt see also Note | Thursday, May 9 |
  | Social/Scientific Collaboration Network | May 1   | Wendy He   Robert Long   |
W2_CA-AstroPh.txt see also Note | Tuesday, May 14 |